tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7221509713237723852.post2276575277714803113..comments2023-06-08T10:57:42.546+01:00Comments on The Truth About Pleasurama: Who watches the watchersGod help ushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12726756701964575422noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7221509713237723852.post-17685194445402960992013-11-03T13:23:10.445+00:002013-11-03T13:23:10.445+00:00does sue Muck do ANYTHING shes paid to do??
exto...does sue Muck do ANYTHING shes paid to do??<br /> <br />extortionate salary, potential to build or destroy our towns. <br />why has the draft letter from SFP been handed to sue? why not HP?? (he is after all our supposed legal!<br /><br />she doesnt have the power or knowledge to change the already amended agreement! <br /><br />FORS's last petition was for no more extensions to the deadline/contract/agreement. FORS petition was snubbed and not discussed.due to TDC not being seen to hinder SFP, this is way past hindrance, more helpful!<br />Grrrrr! <br />Kandy Joneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03507812719557249185noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7221509713237723852.post-41016080124184574132013-11-01T11:46:04.677+00:002013-11-01T11:46:04.677+00:00Dr Sue ! Disclose the solicitors' letter exch...Dr Sue ! Disclose the solicitors' letter exchange and wait to have it explained to you after unpaid, but more competent, people tell you what the letters are worth.<br /><br />I would bet that Eversheds had supplementary advice to proffer.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7221509713237723852.post-80371913870609111542013-11-01T08:17:17.668+00:002013-11-01T08:17:17.668+00:00Surely, the first check which should have been mad...Surely, the first check which should have been made would have been on Wetmore's ownership and accounts? You don't need to employ an external solicitor to do this. Indeed, anyone half competent in business or investment would be able to do those check themselves. Are there not councillors who have any experience of business? <br /><br />As soon as it became apparent that Wetmore was owned by the same people who were supposed to be building the flats, I would have asked them to provide a substantial bond. i.e. if the development isn't being underwritten by a financially viable third party you have nobody to sue for damages when it all goes wrong.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com